Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

PathoGenetics

Open Access

Regulation of TGF-β signalling by Fbxo11, the gene mutated in the Jeff otitis media mouse mutant

  • Hilda Tateossian1,
  • Rachel E Hardisty-Hughes1,
  • Susan Morse1,
  • Maria R Romero1,
  • Helen Hilton1,
  • Charlotte Dean1 and
  • Steve DM Brown1Email author
PathoGenetics20092:5

https://doi.org/10.1186/1755-8417-2-5

Received: 23 January 2009

Accepted: 06 July 2009

Published: 06 July 2009

Abstract

Background

Jeff is a dominant mouse mutant displaying chronic otitis media. The gene underlying Jeff is Fbxo11, a member of the large F-box family, which are specificity factors for the SCF E3 ubiquitin ligase complex. Jeff homozygotes die shortly after birth displaying a number of developmental abnormalities including cleft palate and eyes open at birth. TGF-β signalling is involved in a number of epithelial developmental processes and we have investigated the impact of the Jeff mutation on the expression of this pathway.

Results

Phospho-Smad2 (pSmad2) is significantly upregulated in epithelia of Jeff homozygotes. Moreover, there was a significant increase in nuclear localization of pSmad2 in contrast to wild type. Mice heterozygous for both Jeff and Smad2 mutations recapitulate many of the features of the Jeff homozygous phenotype. However, tissue immunoprecipitations failed to detect any interaction between Fbxo11 and Smad2. Fbxo11 is known to neddylate p53, a co-factor of pSmad2, but we did not find any evidence of genetic interactions between Jeff and p53 mutants. Nevertheless, p53 levels are substantially reduced in Jeff mice suggesting that Fbxo11 plays a role in stabilizing p53.

Conclusion

Overall, our findings support a model whereby Fbxo11, possibly via stabilization of p53, is required to limit the accumulation of pSmad2 in the nucleus of epithelial cells of palatal shelves, eyelids and airways of the lungs. The finding that Fbxo11 impacts upon TGF-β signalling has important implications for our understanding of the underlying disease mechanisms of middle ear inflammatory disease.

Background

Otitis media (OM), inflammation of the middle ear, is the most common cause of hearing impairment in children, potentially causing language delays and learning and behavioural disruption [1, 2]. A significant number of children with acute OM will go on to develop OM with effusion or chronic OM. The high prevalence of the disease, coupled with its recurrent and chronic nature, accounts for the large number of tympanostomies, the insertion of ventilation tubes or 'grommets' in the tympanic membrane, undertaken in affected children. OM is still the most common cause of surgery in children in the developed world. However, this and other treatments are largely ineffective.

There is evidence from studies of the human population that there is a significant genetic component predisposing to recurrent or chronic OM [35], yet little is known about the underlying genetic pathways involved. From a deafness screen as part of the MRC Harwell mouse mutagenesis programme [6] we have identified two novel dominant mutants, Jeff and Junbo, which develop a conductive deafness due to a chronic suppurative OM [79]. Both these mutants represent the first models for chronic forms of middle ear inflammatory disease in humans, and both of these mutants have now been cloned [8, 9].

The gene underlying the Jeff mutant was identified as Fbxo11, a member of the F-box family [8]. The Jeff mutant carries a non-conservative glutamine to leucine change at amino acid 491. F-box proteins function as part of an SCF (SKP1-cullin-F-box) E3 protein ligase complex, recognizing and binding phosphorylated proteins and promoting their ubiquitination and degradation [10, 11]. However, the substrate of Fbxo11 is unknown. It has been demonstrated that Caenorhabditis elegans DRE-1, an orthologue of human FBXO11, and the SKP1-like homologue SKR-1 function as part of an E3 ligase complex, as does its human counterpart [12]. There is also evidence that FBXO11 has arginine methyltransferase activity, catalyzing arginine methylation, but with a structure different from all other known protein arginine methyltransferases (PRMTs) [13]. PRMT activity was not however detected for DRE-1 [12]. Recently it has been demonstrated that FBXO11 can function as a Nedd8-ligase for the tumour suppressor protein p53, promoting the neddylation of p53 and inhibiting its transcriptional activity [14]. p53 is a partner of Smad2 in the activation of multiple transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) target genes [15].

We previously reported that mice homozygous for the Jeff mutation die within a few hours of birth [8]. Newborn Jeff homozygotes have cleft palate, facial clefting, impairment of respiratory function and an eyes-open at birth (EOB) phenotype [8]. TGF-β signalling has been shown to be involved in all of these processes [1618]. For these reasons it will be important to understand the role of Fbxo11 in mouse developmental processes and in particular the impact of mutations on the TGF-β signalling pathway.

The TGF-β superfamily is composed of a large number of cytokines involved in a variety of cellular processes such as proliferation, differentiation, epithelial mesenchymal transformation and apoptosis [19, 20]. They mediate their effects from membrane to nucleus through combinations of type I and type II serine/threonine kinase receptors (TGFβR-I and TGFβR-II) and their downstream effectors, Smad proteins. Certain receptor-regulated Smads (R-Smads) become phosphorylated by activated type I receptors and form a heteromeric complex with a common-partner Smad4. Once formed, this R-Smad/Smad4 complex translocates to the nucleus and, in conjunction with other nuclear cofactors, regulates the transcription of target genes [19]. Two different Smad signalling branches have been described. The TGF-β sub-family ligands TGF-β, Activins and Nodals, are transduced by Smad2 and Smad3. In contrast, BMP sub-family ligands are transduced by Smad1, Smad5 and Smad8 [19].

TGF-β signalling is controlled by many mechanisms, including ubiquitin-mediated proteosomal degradation [19, 21, 22]. A key component of ubiquitination, the ubiquitin ligase (E3), controls the specificity and timing of Smad ubiquitination. The E3 ubiquitin ligases, Smad ubiquitination-related factor 1 and 2 (Smurf1 and 2), have been identified as regulators of TGF-β signalling targeting Smad1 for ubiquitination and degradation [23, 24]. At higher expression levels, Smurf2 also lowers protein levels of Smad2, but not Smad3 [24]. In addition to regulation of steady-state levels of R-Smads, the ubiquitin-proteosome pathway is also involved in the degradation of activated R-Smads [21, 22]. Smurf2 exhibits higher binding affinity to activated Smad2 upon TGF-β stimulation, and Smurf2 is a candidate E3 ligase for activated Smad2 degradation [25]. Roc1, a component of an SCF complex, interacts and promotes degradation of activated Smad3 [26]. MFB-1, a novel F-box-type ubiquitin ligase, negatively regulates Dauer formation in C. elegans by modulating DAF-7/TGF-β-like signalling pathway [27]. More recently, Arkadia, a RING-domain E3 ubiquitin ligase, has been shown to interact with and ubiquitinate phospho-Smad2/3 [28]. At the same time, Arkadia enhances transcription, thus coupling turnover of phospho-Smad2/3 to activity.

We have set out to explore the role of Fbxo11 in development and to relate the Jeff homozygous mutant phenotype to the underlying mechanisms of Fbxo11 function. Given the findings of a palatal and EOB phenotype in Jeff mice and the role of TGF-β signalling in these processes, we have focused our studies on salient members of the TGF-β family signalling pathway and demonstrated that pSmad2 is upregulated in the epithelia of Jeff homozygotes. Moreover, we have utilized compound mutants to assess genetic interactions and throw light on the genetic pathways affected. Mice heterozygous for both Jeff and Smad2 mutations recapitulate the Jeff homozygote phenotype in the palate and lungs. However, we failed to detect any interaction between Fbxo11 and Smad2, suggesting they are indirect partners in the development of these tissues. Our observations support a model whereby in palate, eyelid and lung Fbxo11-dependent modification is required to limit the accumulation of pSmad2 in the nucleus of epithelial cells of palatal shelves, eyelids and airways of the lungs. Overall, we conclude that Fbxo11 is involved with the regulation of TGF-β signalling, a finding that has implications for the chronic middle ear inflammatory phenotype that is observed in Jeff heterozygotes.

Results

Jeff homozygote mutant mice develop a variety of epithelial developmental abnormalities, including palatal and EOB phenotypes. We used immunohistochemistry (IHC) to study protein expression and localization of members of the TGF-β signalling pathway (TGFβ-3, TGFβR-I, Smad2, Smad3 and Smad4) in Jeff mutants in both palatal and eye tissues at relevant developmental stages. Given the apparent involvement of Fbxo11 in epithelial development, we also investigated the expression of these TGF-β signalling pathway members in lung development.

Palatal expression in Jeff mutants

Jeff homozygote palatal shelves start to grow and lift on time, but they fail to fuse at the right developmental stage (Figure 1a) and homozygote mice are born with cleft palate (Figure 1b). This is reminiscent of TGF-β3 mutant mice [29]. To characterize the distribution pattern of TGF-β ligands, TGF-β receptors and Smads in the developing palates, we examined embryonic heads from wild-type and homozygote Jeff (Jf/Jf) mice by IHC (Figure 2). The result revealed one major difference in the pattern and localization of pSmad2. In wild types at embryonic day 15.5 (E15.5), as the midline epithelial seam was disrupted and medial edge epithelium (MEE) disappeared, pSmad2 was largely confined to the oral/nasal triangle area as a nuclear and cytoplasmic stain (Figure 2b). In contrast, in Jf/Jf mice at E15.5 an increased number of epithelial cells are positive for pSmad2 in the palatal shelves concentrated to the tip of the palatal epithelium and the oral/nasal palatal epithelial cells (Figure 2b). Moreover, in Jf/Jf palates at E15.5 pSmad2 was present as a nuclear stain in the majority of the cells. In homozygote mice 57% of epithelial cells in the palate showed a nuclear localization of pSmad2, compared with 27% in wild-type mice (P = 0.000255). There was a commensurate significant decrease in cells showing a cytoplasmic localization in Jf/Jf mice compared with wild-type mice. TGF-β3, TGFβR-I, TGFβR-II, Smad2, Smad4, Smurf2 and also Fbox11, in both wild-type and Jf/Jf mice, were localized to the cytoplasm of the epithelial cells (Figure 2a and Additional file 1). There was no difference in the distribution of activated Smad2 in wild-type and homozygote palates before the fusion (E14.5) (Figure 2b).
Figure 1

Cleft palate phenotype. a. Coronal sections through the palate of E14.5 (before the fusion) and E15.5 (after the fusion) wild-type (WT) and homozygote (Jf/Jf) embryos, haematoxylin-eosin stained. Scale bars 200 μm. b. Cross-sections of heads showing secondary palate of a wild-type (WT) newborn mouse with fused palate and a homozygote (Jf/Jf) newborn mouse with a cleft (arrow).

Figure 2

Immunolocalization in palate tissue. a. Coronal sections through the palate of E15.5 wild-type (WT) and homozygote (Jf/Jf) embryos, immunohistochemically stained with antibodies against Fbox11, TGF-β3, TGFβR-I, Smad2, and Smad4. Scale bar 50 μm. Medial edge epithelium (mee), nasal palatal epithelium (ne) and oral palatal epithelium (oe). Graph: comparison of the percentage of epithelial cells positive for Smad2 in E15.5 wild-type and homozygote palates. b. Coronal sections through the palate of E14.5 (before fusion) and E15.5 (after fusion) wild-type (WT) and homozygote (Jf/Jf) embryos, immunohistochemically stained with pSmad2 antibody. Scale bar 50 μm. Medial edge epithelium (mee). Graph: comparison of the percentage of epithelial cells positive for nuclear and cytoplasmic localization of pSmad2 in E15.5 wild-type and homozygote palates. c. Coronal sections through the palate of E15.5 wild-type (WT) and homozygote (Jf/Jf) embryos, immunohistochemically stained with antibodies against Ki67 and cleaved caspase-3. Scale bar 50 μm. Graph: comparison of the percentage of epithelial cells positive for cleaved caspase-3 in E15.5 wild-type and homozygote palates. P-values were determined using two-tailed T-test.

TGF-β3 has been implicated to inhibit MEE proliferation during palatal fusion [30]. We used Ki67 as a marker for proliferation and examined E14.5 (data not shown) and E15.5 palates using IHC. We were unable to detect any significant differences in staining patterns along the MEE between Jf/Jf palatal tissues and wild-type mice (Figure 2c). There are three cellular fates for the MEE: epithelial-mesenchymal transformation, migration and programmed cell death. We used a cleaved caspase-3 antibody to compare cells undergoing apoptosis in E15.5 wild-type and homozygote palates. The results indicate that there are fewer apoptotic cells in Jf/Jf E15.5 palates (P = 0.017547) (Figure 2c), most likely reflecting the absence of shelf fusion that is followed by MEE disintegration.

Eyelid expression in Jeff mutants

Jeff homozygous mutant eyelids start to grow on time, but fail to fuse at the correct developmental stage and the mice have an EOB phenotype (Figures 3a and 3b). We have applied the same panel of antibodies used on the palates to sections of E16 eyelids from both wild-type and Jf/Jf mice. These studies revealed similar results to those observed on palates. The majority of localization of pSmad2 in wild-type E16 eyelids was cytoplasmic. The staining was confined to the epidermis only (Figure 4b). In Jf/Jf mice more cells are positive for pSmad2 than in wild type. Moreover, pSmad2 was present as a nuclear stain in the majority of the cells of the epidermis. In homozygote mice 66% of epithelial cells in the upper eyelids and 56% of epithelial cells in the lower eyelids showed nuclear localization of pSmad2, compared with 11% and 17% in the wild-type mice (P = 0.000333, P = 0.0000473) (Figure 4b). Staining was also observed in the basal layer and also in some cells from the dermis of Jf/Jf eyelids (Figure 4b). The expression pattern of TGF-β3, TGFβR-I, TGFβR-II, Smad2, Smad3, Smad4, Smurf2 and Fbox11 at the same stage E16 in both wild-type and Jf/Jf eyelids was similar (Figure 4a and Additional file 1). They were all localized to the cytoplasm of the epithelial cells of the epidermis (Figure 4a and Additional file 1). We examined also the distribution of pSmad2 at E15.5, before the closure. In both wild-type and Jf/Jf eyelids activated Smad2 was detectable as nuclear and cytoplasmic staining. In homozygote mice 27% of epithelial cells in the upper eyelids and 19% of epithelial cells in the lower eyelids showed nuclear localization of pSmad2, compared with 41% and 32% in the wild-type mice. Eleven per cent of epithelial cells in the homozygote upper eyelids and 9% of epithelial cells in the homozygote lower eyelids showed cytoplasmic localization of pSmad2, compared with 12% and 9% in the wild-type eyelids (data not shown) (Figure 4b).
Figure 3

Eyelid open phenotype. a. Haematoxylin-eosin stained coronal sections through the eyes of E15.5 (before fusion) and E16 (after fusion) in wild-type (WT) and homozygote (Jf/Jf) embryos. Scale bars 200 μm. b. Failure of eyelids closure in a homozygote mouse (Jf/Jf) at birth (arrow).

Figure 4

Immunolocalization in eyelid tissue. a. Coronal sections through the eye of E16 wild-type (WT) and homozygote (Jf/Jf) embryos immunohistochemically stained with antibodies against Fbox11, TGF-β3, TGFβR-I, Smad3, Smad2 and Smad4. Scale bar 200 μm. Graph: comparison of the percentage of epithelial cells positive for Smad2 in E16 upper and lower eyelids. b. Coronal sections through the eyes of E15.5 (before fusion) and E16 (after fusion) in wild-type (WT) and homozygote (Jf/Jf) embryos stained with pSmad2 antibody (scale bar 200 μm). Epidermis (ep), basal cells (bc) and dermis (d). Graph: comparison of the percentage of epithelial cells with positive nuclear and cytoplasmic localization of pSmad2 in E16 upper and lower eyelids. c. Coronal sections through the eyes of E16 in wild-type (WT) and homozygote (Jf/Jf) embryos stained with Ki67 and cleaved caspase-3 antibodies. Scale bar 200 μm. Graph: comparison of the percentage of epithelial cell positive for Ki67 and cleaved caspase-3 in E16 upper and lower eyelids. P-values were determined using two-tailed T-test comparing each homozygote eyelid with the wild type.

To compare apoptotic cells in wild-type and Jf/Jf junctional zones of the eyelids we again employed cleaved caspase-3 antibody. As with our palate studies, we observed fewer cells positive for cleaved caspase-3 in Jf/Jf E16 eyelids (Figure 4c) (P = 0.008006 for the upper and P = 0.0008781 for the lower eyelids). The process of eyelid closure coordinates both cell proliferation and migration. We used Ki67 as a marker for proliferation, comparing the number of Ki67 positive cells in the epidermis of E16 of wild-type and Jf/Jf eyelids. We saw no significant differences, indicating that proliferation is not affected in the Jf/Jf eyelids (Figure 4c).

Lung phenotype of Jf/Jf mice

Newborn Jf/Jf mice die soon after birth and gasp for air. Moreover, lung development, like palate and eyelid development, involves growth of epithelial tissue and, in addition, the TGF-β signalling pathway is known to be important in this process. We therefore investigated whether lung development was affected in Jf/Jf embryos. Examination of pSmad2 expression in Jf/Jf lungs revealed a similar picture to that which we had previously observed in both the eyelids and the palate (Figure 5a). The localization of pSmad2 in E15.5 wild-type lungs was cytoplasmic and nuclear. In Jf/Jf lungs the number of positive cells was significantly increased and the localization was exclusively nuclear. The increase in pSmad2-positive cells was particularly striking in proximal airways where 19% of wild-type proximal airway cells were positive for nuclear pSmad2, and this increased to 79% in Jf/Jf (P = 0.00005); see Figure 5a. In contrast, no significant difference was seen in the localization of Smad2 between wild-type and Jf/Jf mice. The accumulation of pSmad2 in the nucleus of whole lungs was also examined by Western blot analysis (Figure 5b) and clearly demonstrated a marked increase in nuclear localization in Jf/Jf homozygotes, consistent with our observations from immunostaining. Immunostaining of lungs with a marker for proliferation (Ki67) showed no difference between wild-type and homozygous mutant lungs (Figure 5a).
Figure 5

Lung phenotype. a. Sections through the lungs of E15.5 wild-type (WT) and homozygote (Jf/Jf) embryos, immunohistochemically stained with antibodies against Ki67, Smad2 and pSmad2 (scale bars 200 μm and 20 μm as indicated). Graphs: comparison of the percentage of cells positive for Ki67, Smad2 and pSmad2 in proximal airways. b. Western blot analysis: cytoplasmic and nuclear fractions from wild-type (wt), heterozygote (Jf/+) and homozygote (Jf/Jf) whole E15.5 lungs. Equal amounts of protein were subjected to tris-acetate PAGE, transferred and probed with pSmad2 and actin antibody for loading control. Graph: comparison of the normalised pSmad2 signals in the two fractions. c. Haematoxylin-eosin stained sections through new born wild-type (WT) and homozygote (Jf/Jf) lungs. Scale bars 200 μm. Graph: comparison of the number of airways for three regions of 5.3 × 106 μm2 taken at random and the width of 3 × 30 airways for each genotype. P-values were determined using two-tailed T-test.

In newborn Jf/Jf mice the lungs are severely affected. We observed thickened interstitial mesenchyme and fewer, smaller alveoli than in wild-type littermates. On average, the airway width in homozygous mutants was significantly smaller than wild-type tissue (Figure 5c). Moreover, quantification of the number of airways indicated a very significant reduction in homozygous mutants (Figure 5c). The mutant mice die soon after birth, probably as a consequence of their lung defect. Cleft palate does not lead to death this early. Immunostaining of lungs with a marker for Clara cells in the proximal airways (CC10) showed no difference in the number or structure of proximal airways between wild-type and homozygous mutant lungs (data not shown).

Genetic interaction of Fbxo11 and Smad2

It appears that the Jeff mutation results in an increased expression as well as increased nuclear localization of pSmad2 in epithelial tissues. We therefore decided to examine genetically the interaction of Smad2 and Fbox11. We crossed mice heterozygous for a Smad2 null mutation to Jeff heterozygotes to produce double heterozygous mice: Jf/+ Smad2/+. Double heterozygotes comprised 21.6% (57/264) of mice from this cross, significantly different from expected (χ2 = 8.54546, P = 0.035986, df = 3). However, 66% (36/57) of Jf/+ Smad2/+ mice died soon after birth due to respiratory problems. We performed an extensive histological examination of the palates and lungs of Jf/+ Smad2/+, Jf/+, Smad2/+ and wild-type mice. Notably, Jf/+ Smad2/+ mice with early postnatal mortality demonstrated cleft palate and poorly developed lungs, recapitulating the Jf/Jf phenotype of smaller and fewer airways (Figure 6). A proportion (34%) of Jf/+ Smad2/+ mice survives. These mice do not have cleft palate and appear to display a milder lung phenotype (Figure 6). The surviving double heterozygous mice are also smaller than their wild-type and single heterozygous littermates.
Figure 6

Lung phenotype of double heterozygotes. a. Sections through the lungs of newborn wild-type (+/+ +/+), heterozygote for Smad2 (+/+ Smad2/+), heterozygote for Jeff (Jf/+ +/+) and two double heterozygote (Smad2/+ Jf/+) mice: with and without cleft palate. The sections were haematoxylin-eosin stained. Scale bars 200 μm. b. Graphic comparison of the number of airways for three regions of 5.3 × 106 μm2 taken at random and the width of airways for each genotype. P-values were determined using two-tailed T-test comparing each with the wild type.

Genetic interaction of Fbxo11 and p53

Recently, it has been shown that Fbxo11 acts as a Nedd8-ligase to p53. Neddylation of p53 by Fbxo11 leads to a reduction in transcriptional activity [14]. Given these findings and that p53 is a co-factor of pSmad2, we examined the genetic interaction between p53 and Fbxo11. Jf/+ mice and p53 homozygotes were intercrossed to produce double heterozygotes – Jf/+ p53/+. Compound heterozygotes comprised 44.9% (31/69) of the mice born from this cross (χ2 = 0.72464, P = 0.399397, df = 1). However, all Jf/+ p53/+ mice appeared phenotypically normal (data not shown).

Biochemical interactions of Fbxo11, Smad2 and p53

We explored further the genetic interaction between Fbxo11 and Smad2 by performing immunoprecipitations to test whether these two proteins interact. We used a cross-linking agent to improve the likelihood of detecting the interactions. However, immunoprecipitations with Smad2 antibodies failed to reveal any interaction with Fbxo11 (Figure 7a), suggesting that Smad2 or pSmad2 is not a substrate for ubiquitination by Fbxo11. However, Smad2 did immunoprecipitate p53, confirming the known interaction between these two proteins (Figure 7a).
Figure 7

Immunoprecipitation and Western blot analysis. a. Immunoprecipitation: lung extract from E15.5 wild-type embryos was used for immunoprecipitation using Smad2 and p53 antibodies. The Western blots were probed with pSmad2, Fbox11 and p53 antibodies. b. Western blot analysis: protein lysates from wild-type, heterozygote and homozygote E15.5 palates. Equal amounts of protein were subjected to tris-acetate PAGE, transferred and probed with pSmad2, Fbox11, p53 antibodies and actin antibody for loading control. c. Graphical representation of p53 levels normalized against actin in wild-type, heterozygote and homozygote E15.5 palates, showing approximately threefold reduction of p53 in homozygote palate compared with wild type.

We also undertook immunoprecipitations with p53 (Figure 7a) using lung tissue. We also failed to detect any interaction between Fbxo11 and p53, despite the reported neddylation of p53 by Fbxo11. Intriguingly, we find that in Jeff homozygote mice p53 is expressed at very low levels (Figure 7b and 7c). The heterozygote appears to display intermediate levels. These results suggest that Fbxo11 plays a role in stabilising p53.

Discussion

We previously identified a mutation in Fbxo11 in the Jeff mutant mice [8]. Jeff heterozygote mice develop chronic OM [7] and Jeff homozygotes demonstrate perinatal lethality, cleft palate and an EOB phenotype [8]. We investigated the impact of the Jeff mutation on the TGF-β signalling pathway, paying particular attention to those members of the pathway that have a role in epithelial development.

In mammalian development the formation of the palate is a multi-step process, involving palatal shelf growth and elevation above the tongue, followed by fusion of the shelves and the disappearance of the MEE [31]. Defects in any of these steps can lead to cleft palate, one of the most common birth defects in humans. Murine palatogenesis takes place between E11.5 and E15.5 [31]. All TGF-β ligands are known to be expressed at that stage in the developing palate [32]. Amongst them, TGF-β3 is likely to be the most important in palatogenesis since mutation of the gene causes cleft palate in mice [29, 33] and humans [34]. In palate cultures from these mutant embryos, the fusion defect is rescued by endogenous TGF-β3 [35]. It has been demonstrated that TGF-β3 selectively regulates the disappearance of MEE during palatal fusion: TGF-β3 disintegrates the MEE basement membrane [36]. Studies on the mechanism for MEE disappearance during palatal fusion suggests a role of TGF-β3 as an inducer of apoptosis – cell death in TGF-β3 null palates is reduced at the time of fusion [37]. Smad2 and Smad3, mediators of TGF-β signalling, are expressed in the MEE cells, but only Smad2 is phosphorylated during palatal fusion. Smad2 phosphorylation is temporo-spatially restricted to the MEE and correlates with the disappearance of the MEE [30]. TGF-β3 is required for phosphorylation of Smad2 in the MEE and the inhibition of MEE proliferation during palatal fusion [30].

Our studies using IHC to co-localize the TGF-β3 ligand, TGF-β receptors and Smads in developing palates revealed one major difference between wild-type and Jf/Jf mice. At E15.5 more epithelia cells are positive for pSmad2 in the homozygote palatal shelves than in the wild type. Moreover, we found that there was a substantial increase in nuclear localization of pSmad2 in Jf/Jf mice. This might suggest that the turnover of pSmad2 is stalled and pSmad2 accumulates in the nucleus, with consequent effects for TGF-β signalling in the epithelia.

TGF-β3 plays a role as an inhibitor of MEE proliferation during palatal fusion [30] and an inducer of apoptosis [37]. Using Ki67 as a marker for proliferation we did not observe increased proliferation in E14.5 and E15.5 palates of the Jeff homozygote MEE. However, we also stained for apoptotic cells using a caspase-3 antibody and found many fewer positive cells in Jeff homozygote E15.5 palates. It appears that in the presence of a mutation in Fbxo11, palatal fusion is inhibited and MEE cells are not able to progress to epithelial programmed cell death or epithelial-mesenchymal transformation.

The palatal shelves fusion is a permanent fusion, such as the fusion of the neural tube. During mammalian development some temporary fusions also occur for example, eyelid fusion, fusion of the digits and fusion of the pinnae of the ears to the scalp. The disjunction of the temporary fusions takes place after birth [38]. The eyelids develop at approximately the same time as the palatal shelves. They start to form at about E11.5, grow across the eye from E14 to E16 and, as the fusion progresses, the diminishing gap fills with a profusion of rounded cells that are extruded, flattened, and sloughed off from the area of completed fusion [38, 39]. Failure of the eyelids to grow and fuse in mice leads to the EOB defect. Mouse knockout studies have identified several signalling molecules involved in the control of embryonic eyelid closure and some of them are from the TGF-β family. Mutation in activin βB results in an EOB phenotype [40] similar to that observed in MEKK1-deficient mice [41]. TGF-β/activin signalling via the MEKK1-mediated JNK pathway is one pathway controlling eyelid closure [17, 42]. MEKK1 is not required however for the classical TGF-β/activin pathway, which involves nuclear translocation of Smad proteins [17].

Normally in mouse development, the eyelid fusion is complete by E16, but the eyelids of Jeff homozygote mice remain wide apart. The eyelids start to form the leading edge of the developing margins, but the leading edge is not extended and the eyelids do not reach each other. We applied the same panel of antibodies, employed on the palates, on sections of E16 eyelids. The expression pattern of TGF-β3 and the signalling receptor TGFβR-I are consistent with localization observed in the cytoplasm of the cells of the epidermis of both the developing wild-type and mutant eyelids. The distribution of non-activated Smads is also similar, but with pSmad2 there is a clear difference between the wild-type and homozygote eyelids. Activated Smad2 was present as a nuclear stain in the majority of the cells of the epidermis, the basal layer and also some cells from the dermis of the Jeff homozygote eyelids. In contrast, in wild-type eyelids the pSmad2 is localized in the cytoplasm of the epidermis. The difference is also time specific. At E15.5 before eyelid fusion the pattern and the localization of activated Smad2 is similar in wild type and Jf/Jf. These findings mirror and are consistent with the expression changes observed in the palate.

In the developing eyelid, as with the palate, we also studied proliferation and apoptosis in the Jeff homozygote. Using Ki67 as a marker for proliferation, we found that there was little difference between wild-type and mutant homozygotes in the number or distribution of cells stained. However, we found significantly lower staining with caspase-3 in the Jeff homozygote, indicating reduced rates of apoptosis. It would appear that, as with the palate, the absence of epithelial fusion prevents the transition to epithelial programmed cell death.

We show here that, in addition to palatal and eyelid development defects, the development of the lung in Jeff homozygotes is severely compromised. In the mouse, early lung development begins at about E9.5 with the formation of the paired lung buds and continues through the pseudoglandular phase at E9.5-16.5 when the bronchial and respiratory tree develops, and the canalicular phase E16.5-17.5 when vascularization occurs. During late lung development at E17.5-P4 the distal airways form saccular units (saccular stage) and the secondary septae divides these units during the alveolar stage at P5-28 [43, 44].

Several studies have implicated TGF-β signalling in early lung development. Immunohistochemical studies on localization of the three TGF-β isoforms in the developing mouse embryo suggest that they play an important role in lung formation [18]. TGF-β signalling is implicated in the negative regulation of lung growth and development during early lung organogenesis [45]. Recent expression data also indicates that active TGF-β signalling is required for normal late lung development [46]. Gene-targeting studies also demonstrate the involvement of the TGF-β family in early and late lung morphogenesis. TGF-β3 null newborn mice have under-developed and poorly inflated lungs [33]. The developmental delay is detectable as early as day E12.5, which implicates a role of TGF-β3 in early lung development. Retarded lung alveolarization and subsequent emphysema in Smad3 knockout mice, on the other hand, suggests a role for the TGF-β/Smad3 pathway in postnatal lung growth and emphysema prevention [47]. As the TGF-β family is involved in lung morphogenesis and reflecting the changes in pSmad2 expression and localization in the palate and eyelid, we have explored pSmad2 in the developing lung. Again, we find a significant increase in the expression of pSmad2. Most notably, there is a very marked increase in localization of pSmad2 to the nuclei of epithelial cells lining the airways.

Given the effects of the Fbxo11 mutation on pSmad2 in a variety of tissues, we decided to examine genetically the interaction between these two genes and generated Jf/+ Smad2/+ compound heterozygotes. Intriguingly, we found that Jf/+ Smad2/+ mice recapitulated many of the features of Jeff homozygotes, including the cleft palate, lung phenotype and post-natal mortality. The phenotypes of the Jf/+ Smad2/+ compound heterozygote are not fully penetrant. Around one-third of Jf/+ Smad2/+ mice survive but are much smaller than wild-type or single-mutant littermates. The developmental abnormalities observed in the Jf/+ Smad2/+ mice contrasts with the normal phenotype seen in Jf/+ mice and underlines the effects of the Fbxo11 mutation on pSmad2. It would appear that a complete absence of Fbxo11 function, with consequent effects on pSmad2 expression and localization, can lead to the epithelial developmental defects that we have observed. Alternatively, compromising levels of gene expression at both the Fbxo11 and Smad2 loci leads to the same phenotype.

Despite the effects of the Fbxo11 mutation, and the genetic interaction observed between Fbxo11 and Smad2, we failed to observe any biochemical interaction between Fbxo11 and Smad2. As expected we were able to demonstrate the known interaction between Smad2 and p53. It has been reported that Fbxo11 neddylates p53, inhibiting its transcriptional activity [14]. However, immunoprecipitations did not reveal an interaction in the tissues we tested. Indeed, Jf/+ p53/+ compound heterozygotes did not show any developmental phenotypes. Nevertheless, we found that Jeff homozygotes have markedly reduced levels of p53 and heterozygotes appeared to have intermediate levels. It appears that Fbxo11 is required for stabilisation of p53.

p53 is required for TGF-β responses through its interactions with Smads [15]. p53-deficient mammalian cells demonstrate impaired responses to TGF-β signals. Most importantly, p53 and Smad2 cooperated synergistically at target promoters for TGF-β signalling, and indeed they directly interact in vivo in a TGF-β-dependent fashion [15]. We propose that in the Jeff homozygous mutant, loss of Fbxo11 function leads to destabilisation of p53 by an unknown mechanism. It is possible, given the synergistic interaction between p53 and Smad2, that the loss of p53 at transcriptional targets leads to stalling and accumulation of pSmad2 in the nuclei of epithelial tissues of Jeff homozygotes. Mutant p53 leads to attenuation of TGF-β1 signalling including a reduction in Smad2/3 phosphorylation, inhibition of Smad2/Smad4 complex formation and Smad4 translocation to the nucleus [48]. Overall, given the interaction between p53 and TGF-β signalling pathways, it seems likely that the effects of the Fbxo11 mutation on TGF-β signalling may be mediated through effects on p53.

Chronic and recurrent OM in the human population is known to have a very significant genetic component, yet little is known about the underlying genes or pathways involved. Moreover, although a number of mouse strains are available that show OM, they are complicated by poor penetrance or the complex syndromic nature of the disease. Jeff heterozygotes develop a highly penetrant chronic suppurative OM in the absence of any other significant pathology [7, 8] and thus the Jeff mutant represents a powerful model for studying the genetic and pathophysiological bases of chronic/recurrent OM. The discovery of the Fbxo11 gene underlying the Jeff mutant identified an important candidate for the study of OM in the human population. Indeed, initial studies with FBXO11 SNPs in human OM families have demonstrated nominal evidence of association, indicating the genetic involvement of human FBXO11 with chronic and recurrent OM [49].

Conclusion

The studies reported here support a role for Fbxo11 in TGF-β signalling and suggest that perturbations in this pathway may underlie chronic inflammation in the middle ear. This is particularly pertinent given the studies of a similar mouse mutant with chronic OM, Junbo [9], caused by a mutation in the transcription factor Evi1 which is a co-repressor of Smad3. Overall, there is increasing evidence that defects in TGF-β signalling or associated pathways may underlie the development of chronic OM, and genes in these pathways represent good candidates for future human association studies.

Methods

Mice

The Jeff, Smad2 and p53 colonies were maintained on the C57BL/6J background and genotyped as previously described [8, 50, 51].

Histology

The embryonic (E14.5-E16) and newborn heads and bodies were fixed in 10% buffered formaldehyde, decalcified and embedded in paraffin following routine procedures. The lungs of the newborn mice were inflated with 10% buffered formaldehyde, fixed and paraffin-embedded. Three-micrometer-thick sections were obtained, de-paraffinized in xylene substitute and rehydrated via a graded ethanol. For morphological observations, sections were stained with haematoxylin and eosin.

Antibodies

The antibodies were as follows: rabbit polyclonal TGF-β3 (sc-90, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), rabbit polyclonal TGFβR-I (sc-398, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), rabbit polyclonal TGFβR-II (ab28382, Abcam), goat polyclonal Smad2 (sc-6200 Santa Cruz Biotechnology), rabbit polyclonal Smad3 (06-920 Upstate), rabbit polyclonal Smad4 (06-693 Upstate), rabbit polyclonal anti-phospho Smad2 (Ser 465/467) (AB3849 Chemicon International and 3101 Cell Signaling), rabbit polyclonal SMURF2 (07-249 Upstate), rabbit polyclonal FBXO11 (A301-177A, A301-178A Bethyl Laboratories), rabbit polyclonal Fbxo11 produced by Covalab UK [8], rabbit polyclonal p53 (sc-6243 Santa Cruz Biotechnology), agarose-conjugated mouse monoclonal p53 (sc-126 AC), rabbit polyclonal Ki67 (VP-K451 Vector Laboratories), rabbit polyclonal cleaved caspase-3 antibody (9661 Cell Signaling Technology).

Immunostaining

For immunohistochemical analysis, the avidin-biotin complex (ABC) method was used for all the antibody stainings except for the TGF-β3 antibody. Endogenous peroxidase activity was quenched with 3% hydrogen peroxide in isopropanol for 20 min. Slides for Ki67, cleaved caspase-3, TGFβ-RII and SMURF2 antibodies were pre-treated by boiling in a microwave in 10 mM sodium citrate buffer pH 6 for 14 min. Slides for Fbxo11 were pre-treated by boiling in a microwave in water for 14 min. After pre-treatment the slides were cooled at room temperature for 20 min and rinsed with phosphate-buffered saline. To inhibit non-specific endogenous biotin staining, the DAKO Biotin Blocking System was used (DAKO, X0590). Rabbit ABC Staining system (sc-2018 Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and goat ABC staining system (sc-2023 Santa Cruz Biotechnology) were used to develop the specific signals with all the antibodies except for TGF-β3. The antibody incubations were as follow: TGFβ-RII 1:100 dilution and SMURF2 1:200 dilution for 30 min; Fbxo11 1:200 dilution for 1 h, TGFβ-RI, Smad2, pSmad2 (Ser 465/467), Smad3 and Smad4 overnight using a 1:200 dilution; Ki67 was incubated for 1 h at room temperate using a 1:1000 dilution, and cleaved caspase-3 for 1 h in 1:200 dilution. The slides were counterstained with haematoxylin.

For the immunohistochemical analysis with TGF-β3 antibody, slides were blocked with 5% bovine serum albumin, incubated with the antibody overnight using a 1:200 dilution, washed with phosphate-buffered saline, and an anti-rabbit FITC-conjugated antibody (Sigma, F7512) was used as a secondary antibody for 30 min at room temperature in 1:160 dilution. Sections were washed with phosphate-buffered saline, mounted in Vectashield mounting medium (Vector Laboratories) and the staining was observed by fluorescence microscopy. Negative control sections were incubated with serum instead of the antibody and otherwise processed identically.

Immunoprecipitation

Protein samples from lungs of E15.5 wild-type embryos were prepared by homogenizing in phosphate buffer solution, containing 1% triton X100, 0.5% deoxycholic acid and cocktail of protease inhibitors. The samples were incubated with 2 mM 3,3'-Dithiobis [sulfosuccinimidylpropionate] (DTSSP) cross-linker for 30 min at room temperature and treated as described by the manufacturer (PIERCE, 21578). Total protein extract of 1 mg was pre-cleared with 15 μl Sepharose-protein G beads (Sigma) for 1 h at 4°C with rotation. The pre-cleared extract was incubated with 4 μg of antibody (Smad 2, p53) overnight at 4°C. Twenty microlitres of protein G beads was added and allowed to bind for 3 h at 4°C with rotation. Beads were washed four times with 500 μl of extraction buffer and resuspended in electrophoresis loading buffer/reducing agent (NuPAGE, Invitrogen). As a negative control, an identical reaction was prepared where goat IgG (for Smad2) or mouse IgG (for p53) was used instead of the specific antibody. Cross-linking reversal was achieved by incubation at 37°C for 30 min, after which samples were heated at 70°C for 10 min and resolved in NuPAGE 7% Tris-Acetate gels (Invitrogen). Only one third of the total reaction was loaded per lane.

Nuclear and cytoplasmic fractionation

For the fractionation CelLytic NuCLEAR Extraction kit (Sigma, NXTRACT) was used. E15.5 lungs were lysed in 1× lysis buffer containing protease and phosphatase inhibitors using a glass homogenizer. Nuclei were pelleted by centrifugation and the cytoplasmic fraction obtained by retaining the supernatant. The nuclear extracts were obtained by resuspending the nuclei pellet in extraction buffer containing protease and phosphatase inhibitors, rocking the pellet for 30 min and subsequent centrifugation. Twenty micrograms of each protein sample was loaded on each lane.

Western blot

Gels were blotted onto PVDF (GE Healthcare) and blocked in phosphate-buffered saline containing 5% dry skimmed milk and 0.1% Tween 20. Antibodies were diluted in blocking solution at 1:250 (anti-p53), 1:500 (anti-pSmad2), 1:500 (anti-FBOX11) or 1:10,000 (anti-rabbit-HRP). Incubation with primary antibodies proceeded overnight at 4°C and with secondary antibody for 1 h at room temperature. Membranes were washed four times between antibodies and after secondary antibody in phosphate-buffered saline and 0.1% Tween 20. ECL Plus (GE Healthcare) was used as detection system.

Data analysis

We used chi-squared test to compare the difference between the observed and the expected number of the double heterozygous mice from the two crosses. To evaluate the probability of the calculated chi-squared value the chidist function in Excel was used.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the MRC. The authors would like to thank Caroline Barker, Jennifer Corrigan, Adele Seymour, Elizabeth Darley and Terry Hacker for histology services, David Shipston and Jim Humphreys for necropsy skills and Tim Randall, Lucie Vizor and Sara Wells for technical support. The authors are also grateful to Liz Robertson for the Smad2 knockout mice and to Lawrence Donehower for the p53 knockout mice.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
MRC Mammalian Genetics Unit

References

  1. Kubba H, Pearson JP, Birchall JP: The aetiology of otitis media with effusion: a review. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 2000, 25: 181-194. 10.1046/j.1365-2273.2000.00350.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Davidson J, Hyde ML, Alberti PW: Epidemiologic patterns in childhood hearing loss: a review. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 1989, 17: 239-266. 10.1016/0165-5876(89)90051-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Daly KA, Brown WM, Segade F, Bowden DW, Keats BJ, Lindgren BR, Levine SC, Rich SS: Chronic and recurrent otitis media: a genome scan for susceptibility loci. Am J Hum Genet. 2004, 75: 988-997. 10.1086/426061.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Casselbrant ML, Mandel EM, Fall PA, Rockette HE, Kurs-Lasky M, Bluestone CD, Ferrell RE: The heritability of otitis media: a twin and triplet study. JAMA. 1999, 282: 2125-2130. 10.1001/jama.282.22.2125.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Casselbrant ML, Mandel EM, Rockette HE, Kurs-Lasky M, Fall PA, Bluestone CD, Ferrell RE: The genetic component of middle ear disease in the first 5 years of life. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004, 130: 273-278. 10.1001/archotol.130.3.273.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Nolan PM, Peters J, Strivens M, Rogers D, Hagan J, Spurr N, Gray IC, Vizor L, Brooker D, Whitehill E, Washbourne R, Hough T, Greenaway S, Hewitt M, Liu X, McCormack S, Pickford K, Selley R, Wells C, Tymowska-Lalanne Z, Roby P, Glenister P, Thornton C, Thaung C, Stevenson JA, Arkell R, Mburu P, Hardisty R, Kiernan A, Erven A, et al: A systematic, genome-wide, phenotype-driven mutagenesis programme for gene function studies in the mouse. Nat Genet. 2000, 25: 440-443. 10.1038/78140.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Hardisty RE, Erven A, Logan K, Morse S, Guionaud S, Sancho-Oliver S, Hunter AJ, Brown SD, Steel KP: The deaf mouse mutant Jeff (Jf) is a single gene model of otitis media. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2003, 4: 130-138. 10.1007/s10162-002-3015-9.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Hardisty-Hughes RE, Tateossian H, Morse SA, Romero MR, Middleton A, Tymowska-Lalanne Z, Hunter AJ, Cheeseman M, Brown SD: A mutation in the F-box gene, Fbxo11, causes otitis media in the Jeff mouse. Hum Mol Genet. 2006, 15: 3273-3279. 10.1093/hmg/ddl403.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Parkinson N, Hardisty-Hughes RE, Tateossian H, Tsai HT, Brooker D, Morse S, Lalane Z, MacKenzie F, Fray M, Glenister P, Woodward AM, Polley S, Barbaric I, Dear N, Hough TA, Hunter AJ, Cheeseman MT, Brown SD: Mutation at the Evi1 locus in Junbo mice causes susceptibility to otitis media. PLoS Genet. 2006, 2: e149-10.1371/journal.pgen.0020149.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Jin J, Cardozo T, Lovering RC, Elledge SJ, Pagano M, Harper JW: Systematic analysis and nomenclature of mammalian F-box proteins. Genes Dev. 2004, 18: 2573-2580. 10.1101/gad.1255304.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Kipreos ET, Pagano M: The F-box protein family. Genome Biol. 2000, 1: REVIEWS3002-10.1186/gb-2000-1-5-reviews3002.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Fielenbach N, Guardavaccaro D, Neubert K, Chan T, Li D, Feng Q, Hutter H, Pagano M, Antebi A: DRE-1: an evolutionarily conserved F box protein that regulates C. elegans developmental age. Dev Cell. 2007, 12: 443-455. 10.1016/j.devcel.2007.01.018.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Cook JR, Lee JH, Yang ZH, Krause CD, Herth N, Hoffmann R, Pestka S: FBXO11/PRMT9, a new protein arginine methyltransferase, symmetrically dimethylates arginine residues. Biochemical Biophys Res Commun. 2006, 342: 472-481. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.01.167.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Abida WM, Nikolaev A, Zhao W, Zhang W, Gu W: FBXO11 promotes the Neddylation of p53 and inhibits its transcriptional activity. J Biol Chem. 2007, 282: 1797-1804. 10.1074/jbc.M609001200.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Cordenonsi M, Dupont S, Maretto S, Insinga A, Imbriano C, Piccolo S: Links between tumor suppressors: p53 is required for TGF-beta gene responses by cooperating with Smads. Cell. 2003, 113: 301-314. 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00308-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Prime SS, Pring M, Davies M, Paterson IC: TGF-beta signal transduction in oro-facial health and non-malignant disease (part I). Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 2004, 15: 324-336. 10.1177/154411130401500602.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Zhang L, Wang W, Hayashi Y, Jester JV, Birk DE, Gao M, Liu CY, Kao WW, Karin M, Xia Y: A role for MEK kinase 1 in TGF-beta/activin-induced epithelium movement and embryonic eyelid closure. EMBO J. 2003, 22: 4443-4454. 10.1093/emboj/cdg440.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Pelton RW, Saxena B, Jones M, Moses HL, Gold LI: Immunohistochemical localization of TGF beta 1, TGF beta 2, and TGF beta 3 in the mouse embryo: expression patterns suggest multiple roles during embryonic development. J Cell Biol. 1991, 115: 1091-1105. 10.1083/jcb.115.4.1091.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Shi Y, Massague J: Mechanisms of TGF-beta signaling from cell membrane to the nucleus. Cell. 2003, 113: 685-700. 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00432-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Massague J, Chen YG: Controlling TGF-beta signaling. Genes Dev. 2000, 14: 627-644.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Izzi L, Attisano L: Ubiquitin-dependent regulation of TGFbeta signaling in cancer. Neoplasia. 2006, 8: 677-688. 10.1593/neo.06472.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Izzi L, Attisano L: Regulation of the TGFbeta signalling pathway by ubiquitin-mediated degradation. Oncogene. 2004, 23: 2071-2078. 10.1038/sj.onc.1207412.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Zhu H, Kavsak P, Abdollah S, Wrana JL, Thomsen GH: A SMAD ubiquitin ligase targets the BMP pathway and affects embryonic pattern formation. Nature. 1999, 400: 687-693. 10.1038/23293.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Zhang Y, Chang C, Gehling DJ, Hemmati-Brivanlou A, Derynck R: Regulation of Smad degradation and activity by Smurf2, an E3 ubiquitin ligase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001, 98: 974-979. 10.1073/pnas.98.3.974.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Lin X, Liang M, Feng XH: Smurf2 is a ubiquitin E3 ligase mediating proteasome-dependent degradation of Smad2 in t ransforming growth factor-beta signaling. Journal Biol Chem. 2000, 275: 36818-36822. 10.1074/jbc.C000580200.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Fukuchi M, Imamura T, Chiba T, Ebisawa T, Kawabata M, Tanaka K, Miyazono K: Ligand-dependent degradation of Smad3 by a ubiquitin ligase complex of ROC1 and associated proteins. Mol Biol Cell. 2001, 12: 1431-1443.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Aoyama Y, Urushiyama S, Yamada M, Kato C, Ide H, Higuchi S, Akiyama T, Shibuya H: MFB-1, an F-box-type ubiquitin ligase, regulates TGF-beta signalling. Genes Cells. 2004, 9: 1093-1101. 10.1111/j.1365-2443.2004.00792.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Mavrakis KJ, Andrew RL, Lee KL, Petropoulou C, Dixon JE, Navaratnam N, Norris DP, Episkopou V: Arkadia enhances Nodal/TGF-beta signaling by coupling phospho-Smad2/3 activity and turnover. PLoS Biol. 2007, 5: e67-10.1371/journal.pbio.0050067.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Proetzel G, Pawlowski SA, Wiles MV, Yin M, Boivin GP, Howles PN, Ding J, Ferguson MW, Doetschman T: Transforming growth factor-beta 3 is required for secondary palate fusion. Nat Genet. 1995, 11: 409-414. 10.1038/ng1295-409.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Cui XM, Chai Y, Chen J, Yamamoto T, Ito Y, Bringas P, Shuler CF: TGF-beta3-dependent SMAD2 phosphorylation and inhibition of MEE proliferation during palatal fusion. Dev Dyn. 2003, 227: 387-394. 10.1002/dvdy.10326.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Ferguson MW: Palate development. Dev Suppl. 1988, 103: 41-60.Google Scholar
  32. Fitzpatrick DR, Denhez F, Kondaiah P, Akhurst RJ: Differential expression of TGF beta isoforms in murine palatogenesis. Development. 1990, 109: 585-595.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Kaartinen V, Voncken JW, Shuler C, Warburton D, Bu D, Heisterkamp N, Groffen J: Abnormal lung development and cleft palate in mice lacking TGF-beta 3 indicates defects of epithelial-mesenchymal interaction. Nat Genet. 1995, 11: 415-421. 10.1038/ng1295-415.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Lidral AC, Romitti PA, Basart AM, Doetschman T, Leysens NJ, Daack-Hirsch S, Semina EV, Johnson LR, Machida J, Burds A, Parnell TJ, Rubenstein JL, Murray JC: Association of MSX1 and TGFB3 with nonsyndromic clefting in humans. Am J Hum Genet. 1998, 63: 557-568. 10.1086/301956.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Taya Y, O'Kane S, Ferguson MW: Pathogenesis of cleft palate in TGF-beta3 knockout mice. Development. 1999, 126: 3869-3879.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Kaartinen V, Cui XM, Heisterkamp N, Groffen J, Shuler CF: Transforming growth factor-beta3 regulates transdifferentiation of medial edge epithelium during palatal fusion and associated degradation of the basement membrane. Dev Dyn. 1997, 209: 255-260. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0177(199707)209:3<255::AID-AJA1>3.0.CO;2-H.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Martinez-Alvarez C, Tudela C, Perez-Miguelsanz J, O'Kane S, Puerta J, Ferguson MW: Medial edge epithelial cell fate during palatal fusion. Dev Biol. 2000, 220: 343-357. 10.1006/dbio.2000.9644.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Harris MJ, McLeod MJ: Eyelid growth and fusion in fetal mice. A scanning electron microscope study. Anat Embryol. 1982, 164: 207-220. 10.1007/BF00318505.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Findlater GS, McDougall RD, Kaufman MH: Eyelid development, fusion and subsequent reopening in the mouse. J Anat. 1993, 183: 121-129.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Vassalli A, Matzuk MM, Gardner HA, Lee KF, Jaenisch R: Activin/inhibin beta B subunit gene disruption leads to defects in eyelid development and female reproduction. Genes Dev. 1994, 8: 414-427. 10.1101/gad.8.4.414.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Yujiri T, Ware M, Widmann C, Oyer R, Russell D, Chan E, Zaitsu Y, Clarke P, Tyler K, Oka Y, Fanger GR, Henson P, Johnson GL: MEK kinase 1 gene disruption alters cell migration and c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase regulation but does not cause a measurable defect in NF-kappa B activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000, 97: 7272-7277. 10.1073/pnas.130176697.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Xia Y, Karin M: The control of cell motility and epithelial morphogenesis by Jun kinases. Trends Cell Biol. 2004, 14: 94-101. 10.1016/j.tcb.2003.12.005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Ten Have-Opbroek AA: Lung development in the mouse embryo. Exp Lung Res. 1991, 17: 111-130. 10.3109/01902149109064406.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Copland I, Post M: Lung development and fetal lung growth. Paediatr Respir Rev. 2004, 5 (Suppl A): S259-264. 10.1016/S1526-0542(04)90049-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Maeda Y, Dave V, Whitsett JA: Transcriptional control of lung morphogenesis. Physiol Rev. 2007, 87: 219-244. 10.1152/physrev.00028.2006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Alejandre-Alcazar MA, Michiels-Corsten M, Vicencio AG, Reiss I, Ryu J, de Krijger RR, Haddad GG, Tibboel D, Seeger W, Eickelberg O, Morty RE: TGF-beta signaling is dynamically regulated during the alveolarization of rodent and human lungs. Dev Dyn. 2008, 237: 259-269. 10.1002/dvdy.21403.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Chen H, Sun J, Buckley S, Chen C, Warburton D, Wang XF, Shi W: Abnormal mouse lung alveolarization caused by Smad3 deficiency is a developmental antecedent of centrilobular emphysema. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2005, 288: L683-691. 10.1152/ajplung.00298.2004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Kalo E, Buganim Y, Shapira KE, Besserglick H, Goldfinger N, Weisz L, Stambolsky P, Henis YI, Rotter V: Mutant p53 attenuates the SMAD-dependent transforming growth factor beta1 (TGF-beta1) signaling pathway by repressing the expression of TGF-beta receptor type II. Mol Cell Biol. 2007, 27: 8228-8242. 10.1128/MCB.00374-07.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Segade F, Daly KA, Allred D, Hicks PJ, Cox M, Brown M, Hardisty-Hughes RE, Brown SD, Rich SS, Bowden DW: Association of the FBXO11 gene with chronic otitis media with effusion and recurrent otitis media: the Minnesota COME/ROM Family Study. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006, 132: 729-733. 10.1001/archotol.132.7.729.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Waldrip WR, Bikoff EK, Hoodless PA, Wrana JL, Robertson EJ: Smad2 signaling in extraembryonic tissues determines anterior-posterior polarity of the early mouse embryo. Cell. 1998, 92: 797-808. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81407-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Donehower LA, Harvey M, Slagle BL, McArthur MJ, Montgomery CA, Butel JS, Bradley A: Mice deficient for p53 are developmentally normal but susceptible to spontaneous tumours. Nature. 1992, 356: 215-221. 10.1038/356215a0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Tateossian et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement